Thursday, June 30, 2005

the glories of proofreading

I've been dragging through a very busy week at work. We're in the final phase of production of this issue of the magazine, which is a quarterly. Lots of proofreading, editing copy (again and again) to fit the design space, and frantically calling for photo credits, double checking factoids, and the like.
We've done pretty well, considering that in terms of workflow, pretty much everything that could happen to push the production train off the rails has happened. The computers wouldn't talk to each other. Everyone had a different version of the page-layout program. The server hated one of our computers, we just couldn't figure out which one.
The good news is we're almost finished with this issue and it looks good. The bad news is that we get to put another issue out in half the time it took to put this one out. It's not that I can't imagine doing that--I've put out larger books every two weeks, and we actually have 6 weeks for the next one--but ironing out all those crazy computer problems will make the difference between meeting our deadlines and not.
I've got an Echo column due by Tuesday. Have the idea, sort of writing it in my head. We'll see if it pours out the way I intend, or if I have to go back to the drawing board and write it out before it gels.

1 Comments:

At 11:02 AM, Blogger Chixulub said...

What software are you guys using? I was appalled by Max Barry's revelation of the primitive methods used at Peguin/Putnam.

The magazine I typeset has gone to all online proofing, mainly with PDFs. You can annotate the PDF with flags that look like Post-It notes, with arrows pointing to the critical spot.

A lot of times, people get lazy and type an e-mail saying, 'page 38, second paragraph, blah, blah, blah.' Even then, it's pretty easy for the typesetter (me) to find the problem and fix it.

But since every professional page layout program I know of will export a PDF one way or another, you might consider that as a tool for online proofreading. All you need is hosting space for the proof, which in a closed office would be the one server as likely as not.

Adobe sells some high-dollar tools for editing PDFs, and they have some competition there in the form of Pit-Stop and related programs, but that's mainly for the prepress end of things, when it's gone to bed but you find a txpo in a photo caption or headline that would be embarrassing.

Word has some of the same features, but the weakness is if you end up having to reflow everything in InDesign or Quark. PDF has some features (not sure if you need Adobe's 'Acrobat Pro' to use them or not) that even let you grant permissions to specific people to alter or even view a given file, so if you have a 'too many cooks' scenario, that might be helpful.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home